OneLinersCommand workbench
AI
Back to prompts
plain-prompt

Review a UI for accessibility

Evaluate semantics, keyboard flow, focus, contrast, motion, names, and error handling.

Revision
1
Verified
2026-07-26
Save or explore
Save to collectionCreate a collection in the sidebar first.

Compatibility and paths

GenericWorks with instruction-following chat models.
ChatGPT
Claude Code
Gemini CLI

Trust and provenance

Curated record reviewed 2026-07-26. Results still depend on the supplied context and target environment.

Fill variables

Values stay in this browser tab and are not stored.

Generated asset2 required field(s) must be completed
Objective: Return testable WCAG findings ordered by user impact.

Context: Screenshots alone cannot prove semantics; mark missing DOM evidence.

Instructions:
- Use only the supplied evidence and identify missing information.
- Lead with the finding, confidence, and one safe next action.
- Put read-only checks before mutations and include a stop condition.
- Never request or reproduce secrets, credentials, or private keys.

User request:
Audience/platform:
{{environment}}

UI evidence or markup:
{{evidence}}

Perform the review.

Required output:
- Finding
- Evidence
- Confidence
- Safe next check
- Stop condition

Real example

Input

Modal has no visible close label; Escape does nothing; focus remains behind modal

Expected result

Critical keyboard barrier: focus is not trapped and Escape cannot dismiss. Add an accessible name to Close, move focus into the dialog, contain tab order, restore focus on close, and support Escape.

Source evidence

Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.2official